The purpose of this blog is to provide a comparative account and analysis of various spiritual and ethical ideas from around the world.
I am not an expert in all spiritual and ethical ideas, so I will try to limit my posts to what I know.
In
this introductory post, I feel obliged to provide a few definitions,
and to clarify the transliteration systems I will be using for terms
from Sanskrit, Chinese, and other non-Western languages. I do not
consider this necessary with Greek terms, even though they were
originally in a language with a non-Latin script.
"Spirituality":
To be honest, I do not like this word. Its meaning is quite amorphous,
and its connotations are almost always uncertain. However, other words
that could potentially serve as alternatives, such as mysticism, yoga
(originally, it meant more than just body and breath exercises),
metaphysics, and religion, are equally problematic. In this series,
"spirituality" and "spiritual" connote the theory and practice of
awakening to higher or more expansive modes of consciousness than the
ordinary waking state, whether through union with a divinity, concentration on a specific idea, thing, or phrase, contemplation of the nature of reality, a mindfulness or
awareness practice, or any other means.
"Yoga": despite its modern connotations limiting it to physical exercise and breath control (even Hatha Yoga, upon which all or virtually all modern Western yoga practices are based, was not originally limited to these two things), yoga
literally means union and/or discipline (it is, in fact, a cognate of
the modern English word "yoke"). The early forms of it in classical
India included what we would call meditation, concentration,
contemplation, morality, and ritual observances. In the sense in which I
will use it, it can refer to all of these things. In fact, it can
refer to everything aimed at achieving "spiritual" goals as I define the
term. (I realize that it is problematic to apply this term outside of
its original South Asian context, just as it is problematic to apply
terms like spirituality or religion to non-Western phenomena, but
without such use of terms to translate or interpret the practices and
beliefs of multiple cultures, it would be virtually impossible to
understand anything in the world that did not occur in one's culture
without first becoming fluent in the linguistic and cultural patterns of
every culture and sub-culture and sub-sub-culture, and, heck, every
particular family and every particular individual, in the world.)
"Ethics":
this refers to the theoretical dimensions of morality. Ethics is the
study of the basis for evaluating actions, ideas, people, and other
sentient beings as good or evil, or good or bad. It is the study of the
basis of all value judgments that do not concern inanimate objects and
non-sentient life-forms. Value judgments that concern inanimate
objects, non-sentient life-forms, and even the mere form or structure of
ideas, people, and other sentient beings is covered by the branch of
philosophy known as aesthetics. In my look at various ethical
alternatives, I will do my best to analyze the practical dimensions of
each variety of ethical theory. I will refer to these practical
dimensions as "morality." My look at various moralities will be
descriptive first, and evaluative later.
When
transliterating Chinese, I will use the Pinyin system rather than the
Wade-Giles system. In the Pinyin system, the capital of China is
translated "Beijing," while in the Wade-Giles system it is
transliterated "Peking." The (mythical?) founder of Daoism (which would
be spelled Taoism if I were following Wade-Giles conventions) is Laozi
rather than Lao Tzu in the Pinyin system.
When
transliterating Sanskrit and other South Asian languages of the
Indo-Aryan branch of the Indo-European family, I will not use
diacritical marks. I will also avoid the use of double vowels to
connote longer as opposed to shorter vowels because, frankly, I don't
think it aids in the correct pronunciation of words unless one
constantly refers to a pronunciation guide, which makes reading tedious.
Thus, if you want to know how to pronounce these words correctly in
their original languages, you will need to look elsewhere.
Evan, I've added this RSS feed to http://www.in1accord.net/resources2.html.
ReplyDeleteNow, what do you think of my distinction between ethics (which you consider theoretical) and morality (which you consider practical): "Ethics is the assessment of the appropriateness of human behavior minus an examination of motivation, which is among the chief concerns of morality."?
The way I understand these terms, ethics involves the assessment of the standard by which the appropriateness of human motivations and behaviors is determined, while morality involves the assessment of what motivations and behaviors are in fact appropriate based on that standard. Thus, in my understanding both ethics and morality are concerned with motivation.
ReplyDelete